Launch of the IPO's Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) Resource Hub

Standard YouTube Licence


On 5 March 2024, I wrote in Patents: a New Resource Hub on Standard Essential Patents in May and HMG's other Proposals on FRAND Licensing that the IPO guidance document Standard Essential Patents: 2024 forward look promised an online SEP Resource Hub by May 2024 which would be a repository of tools, guidance and other material designed to help SMEs navigate what the IPO called "the SEPs ecosystem." The guidance also promised signposting to dispute resolution procedures, information on patent pools, and court processes to resolve disputes.

Possibly because an election was called in May the resource hub's launch was delayed until 22 July 2024. It is now up and running and can be accessed at https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/seps-resource-hub on the Intellectual Property Office ("IPO") website.   The best place to start is the IPO press release One-stop SEPs Resource Hub launched by UK IPO of 22 July 2024.  It states:
  • "The SEP Resource Hub aims to be a ‘one stop shop’ for businesses in the UK seeking guidance on how to navigate the SEPs ecosystem
  • guidance includes Technical Standards and Standard Development Organisations, Standard Essential Patent Licensing, and Dispute Resolution and Remedies in SEP Licensing
  • the Hub has been developed in collaboration with industry. It is an evolving resource and will continue to be developed over time to include additional guidance and support
  • the Hub is the starting point to address information asymmetry and transparency concerns within the market. It forms part of a package of non-regulatory actions from the UK IPO to address challenges in the SEPs ecosystem."
As the video explains, the hub is divided into 4 parts and the press release contains the following links to them:
As of the time of writing, the UK SEPs case law tracker did not list the Court of Appeal's judgment in  InterDigital Technology Corporation and others v Lenovo Group Ltd and others [2024] EWCA Civ 743 (12 July 2024) which I discussed in The Appeal - InterDigital Technology v Lenovo yesterday.  This is a very important decision which clarifies the concept of FRAND better than any previous decision through its discussion on limitation and interest.

As I said in my case note on the Court of Appeal's decision in IvterDigital Technology Corporation and others v Lenovo Group Ltd. and others, I shall give a talk on TMT: A SEP & FRAND overview at the Cambridge IP Law Summer School at Downing College on 13 Aug 2024. between 16:00 and 16:45.  I shall certainly mention this resource in my talk and link to it in the resources pack. Anyone who wants to register for the summer school will find details in  Cambridge IP Law Summer School in NIPC News on 20 July 2024. Anyone unable to attend the summer school who nevertheless wishes to discuss this article further should call me on 020 7404 5252 during normal office hours or send me a message through my contact page.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

IP and Brexit: the Fashion Industry

Image
Jane Lambert Our IP system, which is ranked by TaylorWessing as one of the best in the world (see The Global Intellectual Property Index ) consists of some rights that subsist under national law and others that subsist under EU law. When we eventually leave the EU, those rights that subsist under EU law such as the EU trade mark and the Community design will fall away. I discussed those consequences generally in What Sort of IP Framework do we need after Brexit and what are we likely to get?   3 July 2016. In this article I consider how those changes will affect the British fashion industry which relies on EU trade marks and Community designs more than most. I have chosen this industry because I have conducted seminars on IP and fashion in London and Leeds (see  IP and Fashion Law   12 Sept 2015 London IP and Tech,  IP and Fashion Seminar - 7 Oct 2015   20 Sept 2015 and  Second Course on IP and the Fashion Industry   27 May 2016), Importance of the British Fashion In
Read more

Perhaps the Most Complex World IP Day Theme Ever

Image
  jane Lambert World Intellectual Property Day is a worldwide celebration of the legal protection of innovation and creativity that takes place on or around the 26 April of every year.  That day has been chosen because it is the anniversary of the day on which the Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization  came into force.  The World Intellectual Property Organization ("WIPO")  is the United Nations specialist agency for intellectual property. Every year World IP Day revolves around a special theme.  In 2021 it was  IP & SMEs: Taking your ideas to market .  In 2022 it was IP and Youth: Innovating for a Better Future .  Last year it was Women and IP: accelerating innovation and creativity .  This year it is  IP and the SDGs: Building our common future with innovation and creativity  which is certainly the most complex and arguably the most ambitious theme ever, "SDGs" stand for "Sustainable Development Goals"  which were adopt
Read more

Twenty Years of Direct Access

Image
Author   Chensiyuan   Licence CC BY-SA 3.0   Source Wikimedia Commons   Jane Lambert The scheme known as direct or public access by which members of the public may approach barristers without first instructing a solicitor or other intermediary came into being on 1 July 2004. The 20th anniversary of the start of that scheme has coincided with the Bar Council's launch of a new Direct Access Portal  and three YouTube videos entitled What is Direct Access? , What does a Direct Access Barrister do?  and How to use the Direct Access Portal?    I was one of the first barristers to qualify for direct access.  I received my first instructions through the scheme within days of finishing the course.   I have continued to receive a flow of direct access work ever since. The scheme implemented the recommendations of a report by a working party chaired by Sir Sydney Kentridge KC with the title  Competition in Professions.  The   report   stressed that if the sources of barristers’ instruction we
Read more